Do the civil servants who wrote that advice not realise how chilling it sounds? British women do not live under the Taliban in Afghanistan, although we can be forgiven for thinking that, increasingly, Afghanistan lives here. It should go without saying that any man who thinks a woman requires permission from a male relative to work, travel or otherwise conduct a normal life in a Western democracy, and beats her up if she disagrees, has no place in our country.
“Deport him!” cry the vast majority. Yet, in the swamp of moral relativism and liberal good intentions into which our country has sunk, the foreign women-haters enjoy special status. They are vulnerable “refugees”, who need help learning not to sexually assault women, don’t you know, not the common-or-garden, evil, white, English rapists. Why aren’t we angrier?
I suppose we should be grateful the pamphlet was published on the gov.uk website, so at least we can see that the Government knows full well what manner of men many of these “asylum seekers” are, and what they are capable of. Many are dead-eyed strangers to basic human morals. Rape, paedophilia, domestic abuse and sexual harassment should all be avoided, the pamphlet advises. “Rape is a serious crime in the UK,” it says. “You could go to prison, lose your support and accommodation, and it will affect your asylum claim.”
Notice the use of “could” – why not “WILL” go to jail? Shabana Mahmood may talk a tough game, but recent arrivals will already have heard on the grapevine that those are hollow threats. My senior source in the asylum system says human rights legislation compels caseworkers to grant asylum to virtually all applicants from Afghanistan and Eritrea. Even if they are on the sex offender register and have been caught masturbating in a children’s playground, they are still allowed to stay. Why aren’t we angrier?
Here’s a selection of violent attacks from the last couple weeks:
- Two Afghan illegal migrants were found guilty of attacking a couple out stargazing on a first date in a London park. The two men took turns raping the woman while holding a knife to her date’s throat.
- A Syrian teenager was jailed after raping a woman in a public toilet on Bournemouth beachfront.
- An Eritrean man, Bruke Desalagne, was found guilty of raping a male pensioner outside a church – an act of almost unfathomable barbarity. After arriving in the UK illegally, Desalagne claimed asylum and was granted indefinite leave to remain in 2022. I am told by my source that many North Africans pretend to be Eritrean during their asylum claim because they know it means they can’t be deported.
- Abdul Farid Nabizada, a 36-year-old former military translator from Afghanistan who was working as a cab driver in Edinburgh, abducted and raped a teenage passenger. He has been jailed for seven years.
Hang on, I’m confused. Did none of the men above read that Home Office pamphlet explaining rape is illegal in the UK? Perhaps they couldn’t read it. Nabizada attended his sentencing accompanied by an interpreter, which certainly puts his career as a military translator in an interesting light. (Thousands of Afghans claiming to have worked as “interpreters” for British troops have been resettled in Britain. You would hope they can all speak English, or what fools that would make us, eh?)
Figures released in July show the number of rapes in England and Wales has increased dramatically, reaching a peak of 74,700 in 2025-2026 (remember, thousands more rapes go unreported). It would be enlightening to find out whether public suspicions are justified, and migrants and foreign nationals are disproportionately represented in that number. (Countries like Denmark and Switzerland, blessed with a far greater sense of self-preservation, have published research that bears that out – and imposed draconian measures.)
But the British Government really doesn’t want us to find out. In fact, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has defied a specific ruling by the Information Commissioner’s Office, which told it to release the statistics showing criminal convictions broken down by offenders’ nationalities. The MoJ is appealing the decision.
So tens of thousands of young British women suffer the lifelong trauma of rape, but the Government’s priority is to save a few quid and preserve the privacy of foreign rapists. I mean, how warped can you get? All that our political class has left is deflection and subterfuge to protect them from a backlash should the public discover what open borders and abject genuflection to the ECHR have meant for women, children and a pensioner minding his own business on a bench outside a church in Harrow.
Our Prime Minister’s answer to this sexual threat is to tell wealthier areas of the UK to “play their part” and house more asylum seekers to prevent the burden from falling disproportionately on poorer communities. Andy Burnham is right about one thing. The British working classes and their daughters have paid a very high price for the tender consciences of the metropolitan liberal elite. I’m not sure that equally distributing men who need to be told it’s not nice to rape women between Oxfordshire and Wolverhampton – so that Sophia and Poppy can take their chances with hundreds of illegal migrants, along with Kayleigh and Rhiannon – is quite the vote-winner Burnham thinks it is. We don’t want the problem to be shared, Andy, we want it to stop.
Oh, I nearly forgot. This is the week in which Fiona Goddard and her children have been forced to flee their home in Bradford because Fiona’s rapist, Mohammed Usman, is out of jail, having served just half of his sentence. (A terrified Fiona received warnings that her home would be firebombed. There are some in the “community” who see Usman as her innocent victim.)
I’m sorry, but I have finally reached a point where I am so angry I can barely compose myself to write. Scarcely a day passes without learning of some unbearable new abomination. Please consider this column a prolonged and anguished scream in the style of Edvard Munch.
There is no longer any room for doubt that violent and sexual attacks on British women, girls and children by illegal migrants and other men from misogynist cultures are shrugged off as collateral damage by a Government that refuses, for reasons of political expediency and ideological preference, to protect them.
When the state does take steps, they are purely to protect itself. Or, even worse, to somehow manage public opinion before it boils over and to indefinitely postpone the tough decisions needed to stop the boats. (Another 44,000 illegal migrants – most of them undocumented young males – landed on our shores in the year ending March 2026.) Cowardly evasion and Whitehall stonewalling end up aiding and abetting abusers, facilitating yet more rapes. There can be no worse charge levied at those whose first job is to keep us safe.
How else are we to interpret the jaw-dropping Home Office pamphlet, “Understanding behaviours and expectations in the UK: a guide for asylum seekers”, which offers helpful advice to illegal migrants about how to conduct themselves? “We understand that coming to a new country can be difficult,” it coos solicitously, “and that laws and customs here may be different from your own country.” It then goes on to explain this mysterious British custom called “gender equality”. Women, it says, “can work and earn their own money, travel freely, choose who they marry, or choose not to marry. Women do not need permission from a husband, father, brother or another man to do any of these things”.
Do the civil servants who wrote that advice not realise how chilling it sounds? British women do not live under the Taliban in Afghanistan, although we can be forgiven for thinking that, increasingly, Afghanistan lives here. It should go without saying that any man who thinks a woman requires permission from a male relative to work, travel or otherwise conduct a normal life in a Western democracy, and beats her up if she disagrees, has no place in our country.
“Deport him!” cry the vast majority. Yet, in the swamp of moral relativism and liberal good intentions into which our country has sunk, the foreign women-haters enjoy special status. They are vulnerable “refugees”, who need help learning not to sexually assault women, don’t you know, not the common-or-garden, evil, white, English rapists. Why aren’t we angrier?
I suppose we should be grateful the pamphlet was published on the gov.uk website, so at least we can see that the Government knows full well what manner of men many of these “asylum seekers” are, and what they are capable of. Many are dead-eyed strangers to basic human morals. Rape, paedophilia, domestic abuse and sexual harassment should all be avoided, the pamphlet advises. “Rape is a serious crime in the UK,” it says. “You could go to prison, lose your support and accommodation, and it will affect your asylum claim.”
Notice the use of “could” – why not “WILL” go to jail? Shabana Mahmood may talk a tough game, but recent arrivals will already have heard on the grapevine that those are hollow threats. My senior source in the asylum system says human rights legislation compels caseworkers to grant asylum to virtually all applicants from Afghanistan and Eritrea. Even if they are on the sex offender register and have been caught masturbating in a children’s playground, they are still allowed to stay. Why aren’t we angrier?
Here’s a selection of violent attacks from the last couple weeks:
Hang on, I’m confused. Did none of the men above read that Home Office pamphlet explaining rape is illegal in the UK? Perhaps they couldn’t read it. Nabizada attended his sentencing accompanied by an interpreter, which certainly puts his career as a military translator in an interesting light. (Thousands of Afghans claiming to have worked as “interpreters” for British troops have been resettled in Britain. You would hope they can all speak English, or what fools that would make us, eh?)
Figures released in July show the number of rapes in England and Wales has increased dramatically, reaching a peak of 74,700 in 2025-2026 (remember, thousands more rapes go unreported). It would be enlightening to find out whether public suspicions are justified, and migrants and foreign nationals are disproportionately represented in that number. (Countries like Denmark and Switzerland, blessed with a far greater sense of self-preservation, have published research that bears that out – and imposed draconian measures.)
But the British Government really doesn’t want us to find out. In fact, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has defied a specific ruling by the Information Commissioner’s Office, which told it to release the statistics showing criminal convictions broken down by offenders’ nationalities. The MoJ is appealing the decision.
So tens of thousands of young British women suffer the lifelong trauma of rape, but the Government’s priority is to save a few quid and preserve the privacy of foreign rapists. I mean, how warped can you get? All that our political class has left is deflection and subterfuge to protect them from a backlash should the public discover what open borders and abject genuflection to the ECHR have meant for women, children and a pensioner minding his own business on a bench outside a church in Harrow.
Our Prime Minister’s answer to this sexual threat is to tell wealthier areas of the UK to “play their part” and house more asylum seekers to prevent the burden from falling disproportionately on poorer communities. Andy Burnham is right about one thing. The British working classes and their daughters have paid a very high price for the tender consciences of the metropolitan liberal elite. I’m not sure that equally distributing men who need to be told it’s not nice to rape women between Oxfordshire and Wolverhampton – so that Sophia and Poppy can take their chances with hundreds of illegal migrants, along with Kayleigh and Rhiannon – is quite the vote-winner Burnham thinks it is. We don’t want the problem to be shared, Andy, we want it to stop.
Oh, I nearly forgot. This is the week in which Fiona Goddard and her children have been forced to flee their home in Bradford because Fiona’s rapist, Mohammed Usman, is out of jail, having served just half of his sentence. (A terrified Fiona received warnings that her home would be firebombed. There are some in the “community” who see Usman as her innocent victim.)
I don’t use the term “monster” lightly, but the abuse Usman and eight other men in the rape gang inflicted on 14-year-old Fiona makes it justified. The gang was jailed for a total of 132 years, but our joke of a criminal justice system means five of them will be back on the streets in the next year. Usman was finally convicted of rape in 2019. He was originally given a 17-year sentence, but that was reduced to 15 years on appeal, with the rapist citing “charity work in Pakistan”, completed while he was on the run from police, in mitigation. Why aren’t we angrier?
Because Usman and his fellow monsters were sentenced in 2019, they narrowly missed the 2020 legislative changes that require major violent and sexual offenders to serve 67 per cent of their time behind bars. So Usman is now a free man, having served just seven-and-a-half years. If I asked for a show of hands, I imagine almost every reader would support a life-means-life sentence for the fiends who torture, drug, traffic and rape children like Fiona. So why doesn’t the Government introduce emergency measures to protect those scarred women from their tormentors?
For years, successive governments got away with imposing a consensus on immigration, while the authorities brushed the rape gangs scandal under the carpet. Diversity is our strength, remember?
People were scared to object in case they were stigmatised, but not anymore. We can see through the farce of paying millions to the French to enact the useless “one in, one out” scheme. We know there will be no smashing of the gangs until the incentives to get to the UK are removed. We are appalled that the grooming gangs conducted their heinous trade in young girls, and the embarrassed authorities looked the other way in case they upset “community cohesion”.
At long last, the Tories and Reform UK agree we must leave the ECHR so we can hurl foreign rapists out of our country and defend our borders. A reviled Nigel Farage has been right all along. The UK should not “assume that immigrants will automatically abandon ancestral ethnic hostilities at the border, or that all cultures are equally valid”, said Kemi Badenoch. Quite so. If you come from a place that doesn’t understand that rape is wrong or that women are equal, you can go right back there. A poll published on Tuesday found that nearly three in four voters would ban men entering Britain from countries where rape, child abuse and domestic violence are “widespread”.
So, here’s what has to happen. The MoJ must release the statistics showing criminal convictions broken down by offenders’ nationalities. We will not cease till our borders are secured, and the safety of women and children will be the priority going forward and forever after. Not the rights of illegal aliens, who are strangers to our humanity. We are living through one of the greatest betrayals of the British people in our history. Why aren’t we angrier? I know I am. Are you?