crossorigin="anonymous">

Falkland Islanders ‘confused and concerned’ after bombshell Andy Burnham statement.TA

EXCLUSIVE: Falkland Islanders have spoken about what they think of the Prime Minister’s words and Argentine claims.

Andy Burnham speaks in blazer and shirt

Andy Burnham spoke about defence and welfare earlier this month (Image: Getty)

Falkland Islanders are confused and concerned after Andy Burnham suggested that national security “can’t come at the expense of social security”. Critics have suggested this could mean he prioritises benefits over military spending.

The Prime Minister made the remark during Prime Minister’s Questions on September 9, during which he also said: “We will always respect the rights of the Falkland Islanders to choose to be British. That will never change under this Government, and we will be relentless in defending that.”

Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more

Invalid email

You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.

It comes as Donald Trump has hinted that the United States may revisit its position on the British administration of the Atlantic archipelago, and Argentine President Javier Milei is preparing a bill to crack down on companies operating in the islands.

Tony Smith, a battlefield tour guide with Discovery Falklands, told The Express that there is “generally a slight level of concern or maybe even confusion” about the Prime Minister’s remark.

Tony Smith in red coat and beige cap

Tony Smith is a tour guide in the Falklands (Image: Tony Smith)

He added that “it sounds like he might not be giving national security the importance many feel he should at this time”.

“It is definitely a time of concern with the Russian threat to the UK in the northern hemisphere and for the Falklands, the Argentine threat in the southern hemisphere,” Mr Smith said. “The Argentine threat is always there for us, but of course it has now escalated considerably.”

He added: “But otherwise very positive reassurance for the population here from the UK Government and others in Britain, at this time of worldwide instability and renewed threats from our nearest neighbour. Thank God we have at least 300 miles of sea between us.”

Gary Clement MBE, who served as a Royal Marine in the Commando Logistic Regiment during the Falklands War in 1982, said: “I think that some people are a little bit concerned about the whole thing that’s going on at the moment.”

But, he added, he was pleased at what MPs said in the House of Commons. “I was really pleased to hear so many people saying such big things and backing us up,” Mr Clement said.

“People are concerned, for sure […] anytime that it flares up as much as this. I think that it’s just one of those things that we’ve just got to see how it all turns out, but no, I’m not too concerned, personally, at this time.”

He added: “When they’ve got some boats in the water heading this way, that’s when I think I would start panicking. Once they’re en route here, then I think it’s time to panic.

Gary Clement at Falklands War memorial in Stanley

Gary Clement is a Falklands War veteran (Image: Jonathan Buckmaster)

“But in the meantime, I think we see this a lot of just raising their flag and politically [Milei] might be down in the dumps a little bit […] They normally wave this Falklands flag.”

“If you let things worry you too much living here, I think that it would be difficult to live, but I think you’ve got to just take everything with a pinch of salt and see what happens.

“I guess that people that were living here during the last regime, when they did attack, know that feeling better than people that didn’t live through that.”

Jack Ford MLA, chair of the Falkland Islands Assembly, said: “Falkland Islanders are not worried, and there is no reason to be. We have heard claims of this kind from Argentina many times over the years, and the Islands have continued to grow and thrive throughout. Our future is a matter for the people who live here to decide.

“We welcome the Prime Minister’s commitment in the House of Commons to be ‘relentless’ in defending our right to choose our own future, and his assurance that this will never change under his government. It reflects the strong support we receive from across the UK political spectrum, and we are grateful for it.

“But our confidence rests first and foremost on our own democratic choice. In 2013, Islanders voted overwhelmingly to remain a self-governing British Overseas Territory. That choice is settled, it is ours to make, and it is not up for negotiation.”

Migrants just received £11.9bn of Universal Credit – that’s not even most shocking thing

Migrant households have been handed more than £10bn in Universal Credit, Aaron Newbury reveals how Andy Burnham could turn that to his advantage.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham Meets Carers Concerned About The Cost of Living

Andy Burnham (Image: Getty)

How long can a state last when the number of those financially dependent on it exceeds the number contributing to its coffers? Such a question surely must not be far from the minds of our political leaders. After all, the data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) reports make it seem as if the cliff’s edge is fast approaching.

Earlier this year, the scale of the benefits crisis was laid bare when statistics revealed that about 53.3% of the population take away more than they pay in. Yet as ever, it appears misery begets misery, and for the boffins of Whitehall, the latest development in that miserable state of affairs only deepens the challenges they must overcome.

Now, Daily Express readers are faced with the stark reality that the amount of British taxpayers’ cash handed out to foreign nationals in Universal Credit has broken £10billion. That means around one in every six households that received the handout are foreign nationals, which has predictably sparked fury from the Conservative benches, and sent Reform UK’s contingent into a tizzy.

If those on the Labour side cannot fathom why this might be, they might want to head to their constituencies and ask their voters what they make of it. Those Britons might make note of the fact that the bill has soared by some £4.4bn in just two years – something which leaves many questions yet to be answered. It’s shocking.

Even as rumours swirl in Westminster that the Treasury is greedily eyeing further ways to improve its finances at the expense of our own, we are being told that billions are being spent on those born on other shores.

Few in the UK believe a safety net for the unfortunate should be removed. But many will baulk at the idea that those born overseas should benefit from the work and taxation of working Britons.

We are hardly a country that can boast of a vastly productive economy, coffers overflowing with rivulets of wealth, and all the domestic ills put soundly to bed. Speak to anyone, and they can tell you of lacklustre transport, underfunded local services and an NHS ever hungry for further investment. That’s not to mention the black hole in the national defence budget, which has led to alarm bells from former defence chiefs warning that the country is defenceless.

Before contemplating which other taxes to increase, Andy Burnham and his newly minted Chancellor, John Healey, would do well to take even a cursory look at the excessive abuse of the benefits system. While that goes against the natural instinct of the socialist, who are ever loath to suggest that the instruments of government may well be out of tune with the rest of us, it would serve them well.

Yes, a broader sweep through the ruinously expensive welfare state, the seeds of which were planted and watered by successive Labour governments, is needed. But I fear it would be foolish to think Eyelashes Andy is the man to do it.

His own particular brand of popularity, which, like most socialist operators, consists of taking from the productive to fund ever-growing handouts, prohibits a more constructive look at the system. He still has an easy win before him.

At the stroke of a pen, Mr Burnham could command that foreign nationals cannot receive Universal Credit. Undoubtedly, this would agitate the London lawyers, who would swiftly tut and huff dissapointedly, but it would be well received by the millions of hard-working Britons who struggle with the question: Why should my taxes be handed to foreign recipients?

Discuss More news

Để lại một bình luận

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *