Andy Burnham is becoming curiously gaffe prone. Eventually, his verbal missteps could come back to haunt him.
Andy Burnham will survive recent gaffes but one day he’ll push his luck too far (Image: Getty)
Labour PMs have been particularly prone to career-defining gaffes, and Burnham risks adding his name to a long and ignoble rollcall. For ‘Sunny’ Jim Callaghan in the 1970s, it was the “Crisis? What crisis?” newspaper headline after he returned from a Caribbean summit in the middle of the Winter of Discontent. Those weren’t his exact words, but revealed an out-of-touch leader who couldn’t see the chaos unfolding around him.
Tony Blair’s “I’m a pretty straight sort of guy” line still makes the skin crawl, while successor Gordon Brown sank his 2010 election campaign with his outrageous “bigoted woman” jibe. Sometimes actions speaker louder than words, such as Ed Miliband’s mangling of a bacon sandwich during the 2015 general election, and Keir Starmer trousering £100,000 of freebies then cutting the winter fuel payment for pensioners.
Burnham looked sure-footed in his first few weeks, especially compared with his leaden predecessor, but a pattern is now emerging. He has a habit of telling people what they want to hear, even when it contradicts what he said yesterday. He’s a people pleaser. That can be a useful quality in a leadership hopeful climbing the ladder, but is turning out to be a liability in power.
Get the latest politics news – straight from our team in Westminster and more
Invalid email
You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
During the Makerfield by-election, Burnham promised local voters that he wouldn’t “re-run” the Brexit debate, warning that Britain would remain stuck in a permanent rut if we kept arguing about them. His focus, he insisted, would be relentlessly domestic. In power, he’s been unable to shut up about it, banging on about closer integration with the EU and refusing to rule out rejoining.
He’s gone back on his word and casually reopened the most divisive UK political debate of the millennium . Any move towards rejoining would risk tearing the country apart all over again.
This week, he blundered into even murkier territory by floating conspiracy theories about Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum, when his ambiguous statements appeared to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the result and insulting the 17.4 million people who voted Leave for being Russian dupes. Even the head of MI5 couldn’t believe his ears, and and had to clarify the PM’s cryptic comments. But what if the PM hasn’t lost the plot at all, and knows exactly what he’s doing.
Burnham has a good reason to bang on about Brexit. He wants Green Party and Liberal Democrat voters to know he’s on their side. He understands their hostility to Brexit, their appetite for more public spending, their enthusiasm for nationalisation, and tells them what they want to hear.
But he’s also slapdash, because lately Burnham seems to put his foot in it almost every time he opens his mouth.
He’s had to walk back a host of comments, dropping plans to allow drinking at football matches, pledging to help Manchester City’s owners before conceding that no team was “above the rules”, and claiming that funding social security was more important than defending the country.
Now he’s stumbled again, by declaring an individual “responsible for the murder” of former Conservative minister and Reform UK spokeswoman Ann Widdecombe, before the courts had established guilt, trampling over the well-established presumption of innocence.
So far, Burnham’s charm has allowed him to get away with it. But loose talk has consequences. He can’t keep promising different things to different people, then beating a humiliating retreat. Soon people will stop believing anything he says.
We haven’t had that career-killing gaffe yet. But if Burnham keeps firing off like a loose cannon, he’ll soon be added to that infamous list of PM blunders. And when it comes, it won’t just blow up his own career. We’ll all be left to pick up the pieces.
Britons warned of huge ‘new tax’ if UK rejoins EU – ‘billions back to Brussels’
A push to reverse Brexit is gaining momentum, but it comes at a high cost.
Andy Burnham is preparing for a UK-EU summit next month (Image: POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Britain will have to make radically greater payments into the European Union if the country rejoins with the bill potentially hitting £41billion, according to a eurosceptic think tank. The Bow Group has calculated the UK gross contribution could range from £28billion to £41billion – much more than the £14.4billion paid in 2019. This is based on the assumption there is no possibility the EU would agree to restore the permanent “rebate” negotiated by Margaret Thatcher.
Her former aide Lord Redwood, warned: “The UK would need to impose a large new tax; we cannot afford to go in. We would worry markets more with yet more borrowing. The last thing we need is yet more spending and laws from Brussels.”
According to the House of Commons Library, in 2016 – the year Britons voted to leave the EU – the UK made a gross contribution to the EU Budget of £13.1billion and a net contribution of £9.6billion.
Ben Harris-Quinney, who chairs the Bow Group, said: “Despite promises to accept Brexit the Labour party now seems to be set on the path of quietly taking Britain back into the EU. It’s important that the British public understands that doing so would be far more costly than our previous membership, to say nothing of a likely requirement to join the euro, far greater regulation, and further decades of uncontrolled borders.”
Eurosceptics argue the EU wants the UK to return to boost the finances of the bloc. When Czech PM Andrej Babis was asked if would support the return of Britain to the EU, he said: “Yes of course. We need more money.”
Conservative shadow foreign minister Wendy Morton pointed to his words, saying: “Andy Burnham can’t find the cash to fund our defence, yet he seems comfortable with the idea of handing over billions to Brussels. Instead of trying to turn back the clock to 2016, he should focus on a plan for taking the country forward.”
David Campbell Bannerman fiercely opposes EU re-entry (Image: Paul Marriott)
A Reform UK spokesman warned: “Andy Burnham’s plan to reopen the divisions of the Brexit debate will not only betray the 17.4 million people who voted for Brexit, but will also cost this country dearly. Shackling us to a crumbling bloc whose share of the global economy is rapidly declining will be an economic disaster for Britain, forcing us to become a rule-taker yet again and threatening £164billion worth of post-Brexit trade agreements.”
However, a spokesperson for the pro-EU group Best for Britain said it was “unlikely” the UK could not get “some for of rebate”, adding: “It isn’t an accurate calculation of the cost to the taxpayer, and ignores the £92billion GDP growth to our economy that will be gained from EU membership. A gross calculation of what the UK might have to pay as an EU member is like submitting a tax return without any business expenses, or claiming that your turnover is net profit. But voters facing increased living costs, and businesses swamped by red tape, will be relieved to hear that pro-Brexit voices are finally taking the prospect of UK membership of the EU seriously.”
David Campbell Bannerman, a former MEP who served as deputy leader of UKIP insisted that EU re-entry was “totally unaffordable”. He said: “We would be mad to rejoin and anyone trying to rejoin should be prosecuted for misconduct in public office.”
A Government spokesperson said: “These figures are completely speculative. We are building an ambitious, close relationship with the EU that will strengthen our economy and create more opportunities for young people and communities across the whole UK.”