crossorigin="anonymous">

Older state pensioners in new triple lock blow – get £3,000 less for first time ever.TA

Tomorrow, state pensioners will almost certainly see how big their pay rise will be next year. Some won’t be happy.

basic-state-pension-woe

The gap between the new and old state pension will widen again next year (Image: Getty)

Figures showing average earnings growth for May to July are published tomorrow. This is important, because they’re one of the three elements the triple lock uses to determine next year’s state pension increase. The other two are September’s inflation rate, and a 2.5% backstop if both are lower. Tomorrow’s earnings figure is expected to come in at 4.1%. If so, that’s the minimum increase pensioners can expect, unless the September inflation number is higher, which it probably won’t be. So it’s likely to determine next April’s state pension increase.

A 4.1% rise would be yet another reminder why pensioners value the triple lock so highly. But there’s a sting in the tail for millions of older pensioners. There are two state pensions, and how much you get depends on which one you’re on. Someone receiving the maximum full new state pension currently gets £12,547.60 a year. A 4.1% increase would be worth £514.45 a year. That would lift their pension to £13,062. Those who retired before April 6, 2016, get the older basic state pension, currently worth £9,614.80 a year. A 4.1% increase would give them an extra £394.21 a year. Over the year, they’d get £10,009.

Get personal finance news, money saving tips and advice plus selcted offers and competitions

Invalid email

You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.

So new state pension rises by an extra £120.24 a year, from exactly the same percentage increase. That may not sound like much, but the gap rolls up over time. Next April, the difference between the full new and basic state pension will pass the £3,000 mark for the first time, reaching about £3,053.

I’m regularly contacted by Daily Express readers who complain that nobody seems to care about this, and I always do my bit to put that right. They say everybody talks about the new state pension headline figure as if that’s what everybody gets. It isn’t.

There are actually two types of state pension, and they came about because the system changed on April 6, 2016. People reaching state pension age after that date get the new state pension, while those who had already reached retirement age remained on the old one.

The old system also allowed people to build up additional state pension through schemes including SERPS and S2P. In practice, once added to the basic state pension, some may get more overall. Others won’t get a penny extra and often feel treated as second-class citizens. It all depends on the individual.

There’s another issue. Both the basic and new state pension benefit from the triple lock. But basic state pension increments like Serps and S2P are not triple locked. They’re uprated in line with inflation instead, which means that when wages rise faster than prices, additional state pension increases at a slower pace.

That adds another layer to an already fiendishly complicated system. And it means the gap between new and basic state pensioners further widens.

Not everybody on the old system will lose out to the same extent. Some older people have built up substantial additional state pension. Those on the lowest incomes may receive Pension Credit, which tops up their income.

Still, there’s no getting away from the basic problem. Around 8.2 million pensioners were still receiving the pre-2016 State Pension in 2025/26, compared to around five million on the new state pension. Over time, that balance will shift.

So tomorrow should bring some good news for pensioners, assuming earnings growth comes in around expectations.

But for millions of older pensioners, that good news will come with an unpleasant aftertaste. The triple lock will give them another pay rise, while reminding them once again that they’re on the wrong side of a growing £3,000-plus divide.

Nightmare for Andy Burnham as Reform win 7 by-elections with Labour smashed in 1 key vote

The Reform UK leader took to X following Reform UK victories in a series of council by-elections.

Rachel Reeves says Andy Burnham will be next Prime Minister

Nigel Farage has hailed seven council by-election wins for Reform UK. The Reform leader took to X to celebrate the victories in town halls across the country following ballots yesterday.

He said: “Good news! Reform won seven council by-elections last night. Take the St Helens Town Centre Ward, last up in 2022. We went from 0% to 39%, smashing Labour. The Conservatives got 3.6%. They are no longer a national party.

“In Wilnecote Ward in Tamworth, we thrashed the Conservatives. Our vote was up +33%, theirs down -20%. We also won big in Cambridgeshire, Rhyl South, Nuneaton and Staffordshire. Across the country, people get it. Britain is broken. Only Reform will fix it!”

Nigel Farage

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage (Image: Getty)

It comes as Reform has been consistently leading national opinion polls.

The party also swept to victory at May’s local elections, where Labour faced a drubbing, but has not been successful in recent Westminster by-elections, including Makerfield and Gorton and Denton.

But Labour could receive a bounce following Sir Keir Starmer‘s resignation, with Andy Burnham looking set to enter 10 Downing Street within weeks.

Polling by More in Common found that in a hypothetical general election with Mr Burnham as Labour leader, the party would beat Reform UK – but only by a single point.

The survey suggested Labour would win 27% of the vote ahead of Reform on 26% and the Conservatives on 23%.

If Mr Burnham was not leader, Reform takes 28%, Labour 22% and the Tories 21%, according to the poll.

The new Makerfield MP is likely to be installed as leader on July 17 if a challenger does not emerge.

Discuss More news

Để lại một bình luận

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *